Completeness Proofs for Linear Logic Based on the Proof Search Method (Preliminary Report)

نویسندگان

  • Mitsuhiro Okada
  • Kazushige Terui
چکیده

The proof search method is a traditionally established way to prove the completeness theorem for various logics. The purpose of this paper is to show that this method can be adapted to linear logic. First we prove the completeness theorem for a certain fragment of intuitionistic linear logic, called naive linear logic, with respect to naive phase semantics, i.e., phase semantics without any closure condition, using the proof search method in a certain labelled sequent system. Then the completeness of the (rudimentary) classical linear logic can be obtained as a direct corollary by a Kolmogorov-Gödel style double negation interpretation. To apply the proof search method for the full system of linear logic, we generalize the notion of branch in the standard proof search method to that of OR-tree, and give a proof of the completeness theorem for intuitionistic (classical, resp.) linear logic with respect to intuitionistic (classical, resp.) phase semantics, based on a generalized form of the proof search method.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Towards Completeness via Proof Search in the Linear Time mu-Calculus

Modal μ-calculus is one of the central languages of logic and verification, whose study involves notoriously complex objects: automata over infinite structures on the model-theoretical side; infinite proofs and proofs by (co)induction on the proof-theoretical side. Nevertheless, axiomatizations have been given for both linear and branching time μ-calculi, with quite involved completeness argume...

متن کامل

From Proofs to Focused Proofs: A Modular Proof of Focalization in Linear Logic

Probably the most significant result concerning cut-free sequent calculus proofs in linear logic is the completeness of focused proofs. This completeness theorem has a number of proof theoretic applications — e.g. in games semantics, Ludics, and proof search — and more computer science applications — e.g. logic programming, call-by-name/value evaluation. Andreoli proved this theorem for first-o...

متن کامل

Proofs and Countermodels in Non-Classical Logics

Proofs and countermodels are the two sides of completeness proofs, but, in general, failure to find one does not automatically give the other. The limitation is encountered also for decidable non-classical logics in traditional completeness proofs based on Henkin’s method of maximal consistent sets of formulas. A method is presented that makes it possible to establish completeness in a direct w...

متن کامل

On focusing and polarities in linear logic and intuitionistic logic

There are a number of cut-free sequent calculus proof systems known that are complete for first-order intuitionistic logic. Proofs in these different systems can vary a great deal from one another. We are interested in providing a flexible and unifying framework that can collect together important aspects of many of these proof systems. First, we suggest that one way to unify these proof system...

متن کامل

in ri a - 00 28 16 31 , v er si on 1 - 2 4 M ay 2 00 8 Focusing in linear meta - logic : extended report

It is well known how to use an intuitionistic meta-logic to specify natural deduction systems. It is also possible to use linear logic as a meta-logic for the specification of a variety of sequent calculus proof systems. Here, we show that if we adopt different focusing annotations for such linear logic specifications, a range of other proof systems can also be specified. In particular, we show...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004